Legal Opinion

People v. Liner

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the court’s own motion, defendant’s appeal dismissed upon the ground that a Judge of this court could not entertain defense counsel’s CPL 460.20 application after an application had been made by defendant pro se to a Justice of the Appellate Division (People v Nelson, 55 NY2d 743; People v McCarthy, 250 NY 358). Motion for assignment of counsel dismissed as academic.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. People v. NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Sheridan v. Comp-U-Motive, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013