Legal Opinion

Samuel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2009No. WD 69273PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH P. DANDURAND, Judge.

Roy Samuel (Samuel) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of plea counsel. In his motion, Samuel alleged that his counsel was ineffective for promising Samuel that he would receive a five year sentence if he rejected the state’s offer of eight years’ imprisonment and pled guilty to the court without the benefit of any plea agreement.

Factual and Procedural Background

Samuel pled guilty to first degree burglary and misdemeanor stealing in connection with his breaking into an occupied residence. He…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. State v. ShaferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Reeder v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KnoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Richard E. Robertson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Herriford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Jeremiah Wilson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API