Legal Opinion

Surrey Investment Services, Inc. v. Smith

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided October 16, 2009No. 1:07-m-00009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.

Surrey Investment Services, Inc. (“SIS”), and Edwin H. Ferguson, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”), appeal the decision of the Bankruptcy Court determining that the debtor, Zachary Stan Smith (“Smith” or the “Debtor”) is entitled to a credit for allowed administrative expenses pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(A). For the reasons stated herein, the Bankruptcy Court’s decision is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Pre-petition…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Jeffrey and Jeffrey v. DesmondCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Faircloth v. Lundy Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re MitchellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
  2. In re Stainless Sales Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. ATHENA MEDICAL GROUP, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  4. In re Nicole Gas Production, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API