Legal Opinion

Eisenberg v. Eisenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered on August 7, 1989, which awarded plaintiff pendente lite maintenance in the sum of $350 per week, reimbursement of counsel fees in the sum of $10,000 and interim accountant’s fees in the sum of $4,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We do not find the award of pendente lite maintenance excessive. We first recognize that the purpose of temporary maintenance is to assure the reasonable needs of a dependent spouse during pendency of a divorce proceeding pursuant to which the previously enjoyed standard of living…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isham v. IshamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Ritter v. RitterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Rappeport v. RappeportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wittich v. WittichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Aron v. AronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API