Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Rupertus

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1903No. 4,468PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Erom Vanderburgh Circuit Court; A. C. Hawkins, Judge. Suit by Walton R. Wbeeler, administrator with will annexed of the estate of Anna R. Slinghart, deceased, against Peter Herbert and others to sell real estate to pay debts. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Herbert appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

The special finding herein shows the following facts: Appellee Wheeler is the administrator with the will annexed of Anna M. Slinghart, who departed this life August 15, 1901, testate, the owner of the west half of lot six, block eighty-one, in the city of Evansville. Ered L. Slinghart was the husband of the deceased, and they *554were living together at the time of her death. Within ninety days after the will of said Anna M. was admitted to prohate, the husband duly elected, to take under the law. On October 25, 1901, he executed a warranty deed to appellant for the one-third part of the said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JouchertIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Porter v. WaltzIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Sefton v. HargettIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Lackey v. BoruffIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. O'Harra v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shuey v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Weaver v. GrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Hampton v. MurphyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Williams v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Kinney v. HeuringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API