Legal Opinion
Carl v. Shandong Nasen Electric Co., Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided February 14, 2023No. 1:22-cv-00191Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION JORDAN CARL and RACHEL CARL, PLAINTIFFS individually and on behalf of their minor child, CALVIN CARL v. CAUSE NO. 1:22-cv-191-LG-BWR AMAZON.COM, INC., and SHANDONG NASEN ELECTRIC CO., DEFENDANTS LTD. d/b/a GARDGUARD MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SERVICE BY ALTERNATE MEANS BEFORE THE COURT is the [19] Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant, Shandong Nasen Electric Co., Ltd. d/b/a Gardguard (“Gardguard”), as well as the [27] Motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rufus M. Carimi v. Royal Carribean Cruise Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Charles A. George v. U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- City of Clarksdale Ex Rel. Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.