Baines v. Coos Bay Navigation Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Coos: James “VV. Hamilton, Judge. Action by W. E. Baines against the Coos Bay, Roseburg & Eastern Railroad & Navigation Co., and another. From a judgment in favor of the defendants, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Cheep Justice Bean
delivered the opinion.'
This is an action on two promissory notes, for $4,000 each, dated April 18, 1894, alleged to have been made, executed, and delivered for a valuable consideration to the plaintiff by the defendant corporation. The complaint is in the usual form, setting out the notes in hace verla, from which it appears they were each signed, “The Coos Bay, Roseburg & Eastern Railroad & Navigation Co., by R. A. Graham, General Manager.” The answer denies, upon information and belief, the execution of the notes by the corporation, and sets up, among other defenses,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mitchell v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Maxwell v. BollesOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Wood v. Lost Lake Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Veasey v. HumphreysOregon Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by15 opinions
- TURNER, ADM'R v. McCreadyOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Interior Warehouse Co. v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Johnson v. Sheridan Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Rugger v. Mt. Hood Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.