William Michael Jordan v. State of Mississippi
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1, Evidence that a criminal defendant attempted to intimidate a witness into not testifying against him is an incriminating circumstance, tending to show a guilty conscience.1 For this reason, we find no error in the trial court admitting evidence that William Jordan and his codefendant, Charles Henderson, threatened the two eyewitnesses to Jordan’s murder of Aaron *839Coleman by participating in a rap video about killing snitches-a video published on YouTube after the two witnesses had implicated Jordan and Henderson but before Jordan’s trial commenced.
¶ 2. Nor do we…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bush v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Chase v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
- Dilworth v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jordan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
- Charlie C. Henderson v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Michael Greene v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019
- State of Tennessee v. Javon Jolarry SpiveyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
- Walter Carruthers a/k/a Walter "Cookie" Carruthers v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022