Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Zekman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 27, 1993No. 1-91-1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

Plaintiff Seymour Kessler, a former podiatrist, filed a complaint in the circuit court wherein he alleged that he was defamed by false statements made by defendant Pamela Zekman, an investigative reporter for WBBM-TV, the wholly owned Chicago affiliate of defendant CBS, Inc., and by defendants Drs. Turf, Frankel, and Jones, who were interviewed by Zekman in a two-part report televised by WBBM-TV. He further claimed that the report tortiously invaded his privacy by placing him in a false light. The statements concerned his practice of podiatry and whether his negligence injured former patients.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Imperial Apparel, Ltd. v. Cosmo's Designer Direct, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Whittmanhart, Inc. v. CA, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Lowe Excavating Co. v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 150Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Magnusson v. New York Times Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. MacKereth v. GD Searle and Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API