Floreth v. State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARDGETT, Judge.
Action for declaratory judgment and injunction. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants. The issue is whether certain land is subject to an easement in favor of respondents. Title to real estate is directly involved. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3, Mo.Const.1945, V.A.M.S.
Alvin Floreth and Mary Floreth, his wife, plaintiffs-appellants, are successors in title to one Musselman. In 1934 Mussel-man deeded an easement over certain land *615in Stone County, Missouri, to the State Highway Commission, defendant-respondent, for use as a state highway. This easement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schuermann Enterprises, Inc. v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Lloyd v. GarrenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Roanoke Investment Co. v. Kansas City & Southeastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- State Ex Rel. Carter County v. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peck v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Erwin v. City of PalmyraMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Harrison v. State Highways & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Peck v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Broome & Conkling v. City of GladstoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.