Legal Opinion

Clark v. Wildridge

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Assumpsit for work and labor, materials, &c., and a special count on a parol lease for five years. Plea, the general issue. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, Clark, for 30 dollars. Judgment in favor of Wildridge for costs.

Clark brings the case to this Court.

The bill of exceptions partially discloses the facts. It runs thus:

“ Clark introduced evidence tending to prove that the plaintiff and defendant had agreed together by parol, that the plaintiff should have a lease on a tract of land of the defendant, for five years; in consideration of which the plaintiff should pay one-half of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. M'Allister v. ReabNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Edmonds v. PaskinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Kinsey v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thayer-Moore Brokerage Co. v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Newman ex rel. Newman v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lewis v. WoodfolkTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Houston v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Jack Weichman Medical Management and Data Services, Inc. and Weichman and Associates, P.C. v. Domenico Lazzaro, M.D. Joseph Pabon, M.D. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API