Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. International Business MacHines Corp.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided May 26, 2004No. 3:02-cv-00950PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CORRIGAN, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on International Business Machines Corporation’s (“IBM”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 47). Edwin Reynolds filed a response, (Doc. 64), and IBM filed a reply. (Doc. 83). The Court heard oral argument on the motion on April 2, 2004. (Doc. 82).

I. Summary Judgment Standard

Summary judgment is proper where “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact” and “the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). “The burden of demonstrating the satisfaction of this standard lies with the movant, who…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Anthony McCormick v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Jonathan Walker, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Amlong & Amlong, PA v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Reilly v. Txu Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
  3. Cultivos Yadran S.A. v. RodriguezDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
  4. Corning v. Lodgenet Interactive Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
  5. Harrell v. Wood & Associates of America, Inc. (In Re Harrell)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API