Legal Opinion

Bank of Virginia v. Estate of Ingraham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 1, 1990No. 89-02676PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Bank of Virginia seeks review of the trial court’s order of discharge of personal representative in this action for a claim against the estate. Because this court was not provided with a transcript of the hearing below, the order discharging the personal representative is affirmed.

Appellant has the burden to demonstrate error. Where the hearing below was not reported by a court reporter and the appellant has not furnished the appellate court with a stipulated statement of facts, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Southeast Bank v. StevesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Hamm v. AMBASSADOR INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoirup v. HoirupDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Graham v. Lomar IndustriesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API