Legal Opinion

Orndorff v. Lockhart

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided July 29, 1988No. PB-C-84-300 to PB-C-84-303PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HENRY WOODS, District Judge.

On the 20th day of April, 1987, a hearing was held on the consolidated petitions for habeas corpus filed by the petitioners, Michael Ray Orndorff, James William Holmes, Hoyt Franklin Clines and Daryl V. Richley, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons stated in this opinion the relief sought is granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

The facts giving rise to the instant petitions for habeas relief, stated in part in narrative form, are as follows. At approximately 9:45 p.m. on the night of January 8, 1981, the front doorbell rang at…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Orndorff v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Orndorff v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. Ruiz v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1994
  4. Simmons v. LockhartDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1989
  5. Darryl Richley v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API