Legal Opinion

Tonahill v. Southwest Automated Tickets Service

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1984No. A14-84-627CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant filed a motion to extend time to file the statement of facts and subsequently tendered the document. We find appellants have not timely filed the motion. TEX.R.CIV.P. 21c, 386. Therefore, we deny their motion.

The statement of facts was due on September 24, 1984. See TEX.R.CIV.P. 386. Any request for an extension was due by October 9, 1984. See TEX.R.CIV.P. 21c. Appellants filed a motion for an extension on October 18, 1984, nine days after the motion was due and twenty-four days after the statement of facts was due.

An extension of time in which to file the statement of facts…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howell v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  2. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division v. Benjie F. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API