Legal Opinion

Stratton v. Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 31, 2013No. 11-2131UnpublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote a separate concurring opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2Per curiam

Solomon Stratton appeals from the district court’s Order of September 16, 2011, which adopted the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge and dismissed the operative complaint in this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. See Stratton v. Mecklenburg Cnty. Dep’t of Soc. Svcs., 3:10-cv-00137 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2011), ECF No.…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by52 opinions

  1. Perry v. Pamlico CountyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  2. Estate of Daniel Hernandez v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  3. Evans v. Pitt County Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
  4. Beltran ex rel. R.M.B. v. CardallDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. Thana v. Board of License CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API