Legal Opinion

State v. King

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

The defendant has moved for dismissal -of the appeal upon the ground that reversal would require a new trial as a result of which there would be double jeopardy, a violation of the Wisconsin constitutional provision that “no person for the same offense shall be put twice in jeopardy of punishment.” Sec. 8, art. 1, Const.

The state contends that it is given the right to an appeal by the provisions of sec. 358.12, Stats., which are as follows:

“(1) A writ of error or appeal may be taken by the state from any: . . .
“(d) Judgment adverse to the state, upon questions of law arising upon the trial,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. State v. WitteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. EvjueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. McNittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. FlanaganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns v. AldersonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Burns v. AldersonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Swan v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Swan v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API