Legal Opinion

Finlay v. Oxford Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1976No. 52585PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Judge.

Appellee, Oxford, brought suit on a note against appellants as individual endorsers of the note. The trial court heard the case without a jury, and, following remand for findings of fact and conclusions of law (Finlay v. Oxford Const. Co., 138 Ga. App. 49 (225 SE2d 495)), entered judgment for Oxford.

The evidence shows that on January 18, 1974, the Nineteen Corporation executed a note to Oxford for $77,258.98 payable in 60 days and bearing interest at 10%. The appellants personally endorsed the note on the reverse side. Appellants failed to pay the note after it became due,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Linam v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Reynolds v. Service Loan & Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Waterman v. Howard Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Icard v. HarbuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Finlay v. Oxford Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grace v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. MPP Investments, Inc. v. Cherokee Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. Rothstein v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Frank Maddox Realty & Mortgage, Inc. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Mize v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API