Commonwealth, Aplt v. Hackett, R.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceChief Justice Castille
I join Parts I, 11(A), and III of the Majority Opinion. The Court, in my judgment, properly reverses the PCRA1 court’s vacatur of appellee’s death sentence on grounds that he is mentally retarded, and thus is death-ineligible under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), which held that murderers proven to be “mentally retarded” cannot receive the ultimate penalty. The second claim (Part 11(B)) asks the Court to consider a more basic question posed by cases such as this: whether the construct and approach developed for considering Atkins claims generally…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Hall v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Commonwealth v. RoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.