Legal Opinion

(HC) Craig v. D'Agostini

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 15, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01198Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, No. 2:21-CV-1198-JAM-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JOHN D’AGOSTINI, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, an inmate proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s first amended petition 19 for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 5. 20 Rule 4 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases provides for summary 21 dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Neal v. ShimodaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Rizzo v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API