State v. Comenout
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
¶1 The primary issue presented by this case is whether the State of Washington has jurisdiction over members of Indian tribes who sell unstamped cigarettes without a license at a store that is located on trust allotment land that is outside the boundaries of an Indian reservation. We conclude that the State does possess jurisdiction in such cases, and, thus, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion of the defendants herein to dismiss the charges against them.
*237¶2 In 2007 and 2008, agents of the Washington State Liquor Control Board purchased cigarettes from the “Indian Country Store” in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SohappyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. PinkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. PinkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. WilburCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Quinault Indian Nation v. Mary PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- State v. JimWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- United States v. WilburCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012