Legal Opinion

United States v. Young

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 4, 2014No. 12-513(L), 12-1054(CON), 12-1328(CON)UnpublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Defendants Young, Chambliss, and Fuller stand convicted after trial of various substantive and conspiratorial counts of narcotics trafficking, robbery, firearms possession, and murder. On this appeal, defendants charge the district court with multiple trial and sentencing errors. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the record of prior proceedings, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm.

1. Defendants’ Trial Challenges

a. Young’s Hearsay Challenges

Young challenges the admission of various out-of-court statements by non-testifying…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Melgar-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Shane HareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  4. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  5. United States v. Jose BranCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API