Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Codianna

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1977No. 14248Published

1ConcurrenceCrockett, Justice

Regrettably, I am unable to agree with the statement that there was error in the discussion in chambers of the proposal that the trial of Dunsdon be severed. I do not regard such a discussion between the court and counsel as to how a trial shall proceed as part of the trial itself. Furthermore, it was certainly no error as to Dunsdon; and it was he who was to be affected thereby if the request had been granted. The trial court’s rejection of the suggestion could not be otherwise than favorable to the other defendants.

Nor do I see that there was any error with respect to the picture. If a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RenzoUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. WoodsUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Dillon v. DillonNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API