Turner v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentBuchanan, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
I
I do not agree with the majority's conclusion that a factual basis was required for Turner's guilty plea to be accepted. Turner's plea was entered prior to the 19783 effective date of Ind.Code 385-4.1-1-4(b) (1973) [now Ind.Code 85-385-1-8(b)] which was the first statutory requirement that a factual basis be established before a guilty plea could be accepted. The majority cites Harshman v. State (1958), 282 Ind. 618, 115 N.E.2d 501, for the proposition that a factual basis was required prior to the enactment of I.C. 85-4.1-1-4(b). I do not think so.
In Horshkman, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Harshman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.