Derksen v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Justice.
An issue of first impression is presented in this appeal asking whether the offense of taking immodest, immoral or indecent liberties with a child is a lesser included offense of second-degree sexual assault. Appellant, Frank W. Derksen (Derksen), contends it was plain error to permit the lesser included offense instruction from which his conviction resulted. We agree.
I. ISSUES
Appellant states multiple issues for this court’s consideration:
ISSUE I
Was it plain error to allow jury instruction no. 12 which stated that taking immodest, immoral, or indecent liberties with a minor…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sorenson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Pierson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Owen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.