Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ray
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1964No. 1060PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
This appeal concerns a concursus proceeding brought under LSA-C.C.P. Art. 4651 et seq. Presented for our decision is the question whether the claimants, who withdrew funds deposited for their account under an admission of liability, are thereby prevented from prosecuting other claims related to the incident which gave rise to the admission of liability as to the funds deposited.
The defendant claimants appeal from judgment on the pleadings holding that, by their withdrawal of the funds deposited, they acquiesced in other demands of the *149concursus petition for declaratory relief…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Breaux v. LairdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- McDonald v. Grande CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Poynter v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Mestayer v. Cities Service Development CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Transo Investment Corporation v. OakleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wright v. RomanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- LaGraize v. BickhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Luttrell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964