Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Gambi, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Louis A. Barone, J.

The defendant argues that in order for the results of a breathalyzer test to be introduced in either a civil or criminal action, there must be strict compliance with Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194.

The defendant "Rosebud” alleges that the defendant Zois was arrested for driving while intoxicated somewhere between 3:58 a.m. and 4:19 a.m. The arresting officer affirms that *962defendant Zois was placed under arrest when the responding ambulance left the scene of the accident.

Pursuant to the prehospital care report completed by the ambulance personnel, they…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. HummelNassau County District Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API