Intuit Inc. v. H&R Block, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 INTUIT INC., Case No. 5:24-cv-00253-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING ECF NO. 114; 9 v. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ECF NOS. 115, 117 10 HRB TAX GROUP, INC., et al., [Re: ECF Nos. 114, 115, 117] 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Before the Court are two administrative motions filed in connection with Defendants HRB 15 Tax Group, Inc. and HRB Digital LLC’s (“Block”) Opposition to Plaintiff Intuit Inc.’s (“Intuit”) 16 Motion for Preliminary Injunction: 17 1. Block’s Administrative Motion to Seal Portions…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Phillips v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. Gadbois v. PharMerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927