Great American Insurance Co. v. The Vessel Pacific Princess
High Court of American Samoa
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Associate Justice.
The above captioned matter came before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, having subrogated to the rights of its insured, seeks partial recovery. We do not reach all of the issues asserted because Defendant's motion and the opposition thereto is disposative. This action involves a contract for the carriage of goods by sea from a point in Australia to Guam and the Northern Marianas. The first count alleges damages in the amount of $7,500 for ruined chocolates. The second count alleges nearly $50,000 in damages for frozen meats that were…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Madruga v. Superior Court of Cal., County of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- The" City of Panama"Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.