Legal Opinion

Walker v. Garland

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1922No. Nos. 267-3490PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error' to Court of Civil Appeals of Eirst Supreme Judicial District. Action by W. J. Walker against D. N. Garland and others. A judgment for defendants was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (220 S. W. 399), and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiff in error, W. J. Walker, brought suit in the district court of Matagorda county, Tex., against D. N. Garland, Inez Garland, his wife, J. C. Barr, and Ollie Lou Barr, his wife, upon a judgment rendered May 12, 1917, in the district court of Oklahoma county, Okl., in favor of Walker as intervening plaintiff in the suit of Union Trust Company et al. v. D. N. Garland et al., numbered 13315 on the docket of said court. The petition alleges that the amount of the judgment is $8,662.50, with interest thereon from May 12, 1917, and all costs; that no part thereof has been paid or satisfied;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hanley v. DonoghueSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Linn v. ArambouldTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Grant v. Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Bailey v. BlockTexas Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Construction & General Labor Union, Local No. 688 v. StephensonTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ferguson-McKinney Dry Goods Co. v. GarrettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Eagle Oil & Gas Co. v. Shale Exploration, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. Ex Parte PadfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Coane v. Girard Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API