Legal Opinion

Clayton's Automotive v. Stayton Auto Supply

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 1981No. WCB Case Nos. 79-08090 and 79-04846, CA A21216PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This case presents a factual question whether claimant’s low back injury was an aggravation of a previous compensable injury or a new injury. The Workers’ Compensation Board, reversing the referee, determined that it was a new injury. The responsible employer and insurer appeal, and we affirm.

In November, 1974, while working for Stayton Auto Supply (Stayton), claimant injured his low back lifting a wheel and tire. A lumbar laminectomy was performed, and claimant received a compensation award for 30 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability. Claimant was hospitalized in December, 1976,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harris v. District of Columbia Office of Worker's CompensationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. United Pacific Reliance Insurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API