Clayton's Automotive v. Stayton Auto Supply
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
This case presents a factual question whether claimant’s low back injury was an aggravation of a previous compensable injury or a new injury. The Workers’ Compensation Board, reversing the referee, determined that it was a new injury. The responsible employer and insurer appeal, and we affirm.
In November, 1974, while working for Stayton Auto Supply (Stayton), claimant injured his low back lifting a wheel and tire. A lumbar laminectomy was performed, and claimant received a compensation award for 30 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability. Claimant was hospitalized in December, 1976,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harris v. District of Columbia Office of Worker's CompensationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- United Pacific Reliance Insurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983