Lockhart v. McCurley
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
DISSENT TO ORDER
TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.
I agree with the Court’s order down to the point of its determination that Lock-hart’s explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal provides the proper justification to grant an implied motion for extension of time. 1 I would grant McCur-ley’s motion to dismiss.
We all agree that Lockhart’s notice of appeal was late. We all agree that Lock-hart’s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was late and must be denied. We all agree that under Texas Supreme Court precedent there is, nevertheless, a motion for extension of time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Meshwert v. MeshwertTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- In the Interest of B.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Houser v. McElveenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jeffrey Scott Lockhart v. Dale Patrick McCurley D/B/A Midlothian Insurance Agency, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
- Jeffrey Scott Lockhart v. Dale Patrick McCurley D/B/A Midlothian Insurance Agency, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
- in Re XTO Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009