Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. McCurley

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided October 21, 2009No. 10-09-00240-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISSENT TO ORDER

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.

I agree with the Court’s order down to the point of its determination that Lock-hart’s explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal provides the proper justification to grant an implied motion for extension of time. 1 I would grant McCur-ley’s motion to dismiss.

We all agree that Lockhart’s notice of appeal was late. We all agree that Lock-hart’s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was late and must be denied. We all agree that under Texas Supreme Court precedent there is, nevertheless, a motion for extension of time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Meshwert v. MeshwertTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In the Interest of B.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Houser v. McElveenTexas Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jeffrey Scott Lockhart v. Dale Patrick McCurley D/B/A Midlothian Insurance Agency, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  2. Jeffrey Scott Lockhart v. Dale Patrick McCurley D/B/A Midlothian Insurance Agency, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010
  3. in Re XTO Energy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API