Legal Opinion

Ash v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 11, 1928No. 3035PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Old bagging, imported at Houston, Tex., was classified by the collector as bags made of jute and assessed for duty at 1 cent per pound and 10 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1018 which reads as follows:

1018. Bags or sacks made from plain woven fabrics of single jute yarns or from twilled or other fabrics composed wholly of jute, not bleached, printed, stenciled, painted, dyed, colored, nor rendered noninflammable, 1 cent per pound and 10 per centum ad valorem; * * *

The importer protested that the bagging was waste bagging or waste sugar sackcloth and that it was • therefore…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rachman Bag Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Darmstadt Scott & Courtney v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. Chicago Mica Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  4. Coppersmith v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. United States v. TowerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API