State ex rel. Rogers v. Township Committee
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On application for mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
On the 25th day of March, 1886, a rule was granted by this court, that the township committee óf the township of Neptune, in the county of Monmouth, do show caiise why a writ of mandamus should not issue commanding the said committee to pay over forthwith all money due to George W. Rogers, agreeably to the provisions- of an act entitled “An act for the preservation of sheep,” approved April 14th, 1846, and the supplement thereto, approved March 29th, 1866.- Rev., p. 19, pi. 29. The names of those who constituted the township committee for…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Morrison v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Lincoln Loan Co. v. State, State Highway Com'nOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Sisters of St. Joseph Corp. v. Atlas Sand, Gravel & Stone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Adams v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.