Legal Opinion
Brandt v. MIT Development Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 13, 2008No. Civil Action 3:01cv1889 (SRU)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
In 2001, Leonard Brandt sued George Holley, Robert Salem, 1 MIT Development Corporation (“MIT”), and Home Diagnostics, Inc. (“HDI”). HDI manufactures and sells in-home testing systems for people with diabetes. In his lawsuit, Brandt claimed that he had entered into an agreement with Holley, Salem, and MIT, a company that has since merged with HDI, to provide consulting services to the defendants. Brandt claimed that, under the agreement, he was entitled to a small monthly retainer fee, plus ten percent of any assets certain parties received,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Febus v. Guardian First Funding Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Doe v. Hotchkiss SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Wealthberg v. GE Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021