Legal Opinion
State v. Pressley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 22, 2010No. 98,823PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Biles, J.:
David N. Pressley argues a 16-month delay to impose a criminal sentence violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. We hold speedy trial requirements do not include sentencing as previously determined by this court in State v. Freeman, 236 Kan. 274, 280, 689 P.2d 885 (1984). We affirm the sentence.
Factual and Procedural Background
On November 8,2005, Pressley was convicted of two aggravated robberies, aggravated burglary, and attempted aggravated robbery after a bench trial on stipulated facts. Sentencing was set for December 15,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Betterman v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Betterman v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. BannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Pressley v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 2010