Legal Opinion
Re Taxes, Armstrong Perry
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1963No. 4079PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
46 Haw. 269 (1963)
379 P.2d 336
IN RE TAXES, ARMSTRONG PERRY, DBA HERBERT PERRY & SON AND DBA ROBY-PERRY ASSOCIATES.
No. 4079.
Supreme Court of Hawaii.
January 31, 1963.
TSUKIYAMA, C.J., CASSIDY, WIRTZ, JJ., KING, CIRCUIT JUDGE, IN PLACE OF LEWIS, J., DISQUALIFIED, AND HEWITT, CIRCUIT JUDGE, IN PLACE OF MIZUHA, J., DISQUALIFIED.
Edward Berman for appellant.
Shiro Kashiwa, Attorney General, and Nobuki Kamida, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
OPINION OF THE COURT BY CIRCUIT JUDGE KING.
Appellant Armstrong Perry was assessed a general excise tax under chapter 101, as amended, Revised Laws of Hawaii…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gwin, White & Prince, Inc. v. HennefordSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- RAMSAY TRAVEL, INCORPORATED v. KondoHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- Atlas Elevator Co. v. Presiding Judge of the Circuit CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
- RAMSAY TRAVEL, INCORPORATED v. KondoHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Battle v. B. D. Bailey & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. BD Bailey & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1966