Legal Opinion

Merrick v. Giddings

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1879No. Law. No. 18,066PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The Case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wylie

This is an action for an alleged violation of a personal contract.

The defendant, at the time the action was brought, and when he was served with the summons requiring him to appear, was a member of the House of Representatives from the State of Texas, in attendance on its sessions in this District. To the declaration of the plaintiffs, the defendant filed a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, claiming that, by reason of his privilege as such member in attendance, he was *56exempt from liability to service of the process in the action ; and to that plea, the plaintiffs filed a demurrer for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. GEYER'S v. IrwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1790
  2. Lyell v. GoodwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1845
  3. Bolton v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1788
  4. Case v. RorabacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yuma Greyhound Park, Inc. v. HardyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Carl v. FerrellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API