Legal Opinion
Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided September 7, 1966No. 4392PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JUDGMENT DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND AMENDED COMPLAINT
JAMES F. GORDON, District Judge.
Preliminary Statement
This is a civil anti-trust action brought under the Clayton Act, §§ 4 and 16, 38 Stat. 731, 737, 15 U.S.C. §§ 14 and 26, for alleged violation by the defendants of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2. Although the complaint states that the action is instituted under 15 U.S.C. § 14, which is Section 3 of the Clayton Act, plaintiff now asserts that this was a typographical error. For the purpose of deciding the motion before the Court,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lightfoot v. MacDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corporation and United States Steel Homes Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Guess v. SnyderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Oliver v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corporation, and U. S. Steel Homes Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968