Legal Opinion

B.F. Goodrich Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 9, 1993No. Court No. 90-05-00228Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Musgrave, Judge:

On November 3, 1992, counsel for Customs submitted a letter to which was attached a General Notice published in Customs Bulletin & Decisions, Vol. 26, No. 43 (October 21 1992) describing the steps Customs has taken to comply with this Court’s judgment. Plaintiff was refunded its drawback claims but asserts that Customs did not comply with the Court’s judgment. See B.F. Goodrich Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 333, 794 F. Supp. 1148 (1992), as amended, 16 CIT 455, 794 F. Supp. 1148 (1992).

Defendant argues that since the plaintiff has conceded that it is content with its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Madison Galleries, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Pagoda Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  3. Central Soya Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  4. Central Soya Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Holmes Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API