Legal Opinion

Brunning v. R. W. Hillcoat Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 12, 1943No. 36776Published

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

These two actions for damages for wilfull and deliberate trespass in cutting and .removing a quantity of merchantable trees from the respective lands of the plaintiffs were consolidated for trial with the stipulation that separate judgments be rendered.'

In both cases the defendants admitted that the plaintiffs owned the lands in question ; that their employees cut and removed certain long leaf pine and cypress trees therefrom and manufactured it into lumber; and that they were liable for the stumpage value of the timber. They pleaded having acted in good faith and denied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  2. St. Paul v. Louisiana Cypress Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  3. Hickman v. Hill, Harris & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API