Legal Opinion
In re T. A. McIntyre & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 14, 1911No. 184PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Petition to Review Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In the matter of T. A. McIntyre & Co., bankrupts. Petition by Mary D. Grace to revise an order dismissing her claim to follow proceeds of converted securities.
1Opinion of the Court
NOYES, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The District Judge, in confirming the master’s report, said:
“The right of participation in the deposit account of McIntyre & Co. in the Bank of Commerce, granted to persons whose securities were never pledged to that institution — and the subject, of objection -by the trustees— is an extreme application of the doctrine of Knatchbull v. Hallett, 13 Ch. Div. 696, 36 Eng. Rep. 779, yet seems to me correct.”
Wc think this statement well founded, and yet the petitioner here seeks to carry the doctrine of following trust funds far beyond…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Macy v. RoedenbeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- In Re United Cigar Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- In re A. D. Matthews' Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- In re BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- In re ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.