State v. Ross
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Scioto County
1Opinion of the CourtHarsha, J.
{¶ 1} Based upon his possession, funding and sales of certain controlled substance analogs, Michel L. Ross pleaded guilty to engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, conspiracy to engage in a pattern of corrupt activity, and aggravated funding of drug trafficking. Ross failed to appear for the sentencing hearing and remained at large for three years. Upon his apprehension, he received an aggregate 30-year prison term.
{¶ 2} First Ross asserts that his conviction should be overturned because his acts occurred between October 17, 2011 and December 18, 2011, but selling and possessing *85controlled…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nat'l Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3 v. Dunlap, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Ross County2018
- State v. RainesOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. DickOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. LawrenceOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Jackson v. KinkaidOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.