Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Policeman's Benevolent Ass'n v. Borough of North Haledon

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 5, 1997Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

A.A. RODRÍGUEZ, J.A.D.,

dissenting in part, concurring in part.

I disagree in part with the result reached by the majority. I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the time limitation set by *467N.J.S.A. 2A:24-7 applies equally to a party seeking confirmation and to a party seeking vacation, modification or correction of an arbitration award. Because plaintiff failed to seek confirmation within the three-month period authorized by the Arbitration Act 1 I would reverse the judgment confirming the award. However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that plaintiff is not entitled to seek…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tretina Printing, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  2. Heffner v. JacobsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Pana v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API