State v. Greer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
Charles Darren Greer (“defendant”) appeals from his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder. He specifically complains that the rule allowing jurors to ask questions is unconstitutional, and he contends that he was denied his right of appeal because the court reporter failed to transcribe the poll of the jury. We disagree with both contentions for the reasons which follow and we thus affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The defendant and the victim got into a fight which resulted in the victim’s death by strangulation. The defendant then buried the victim’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Arizona Employers' Liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Mohammad Ajmal, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Muhammad Afzal and Hassan Sabghat UllahkhanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- DeBenedetto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Arthur SuttonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Handy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Rivera v. ConwayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. Uriarte-VelazquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016