Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Connors, Fiscina, Swartz & Zimmerly
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 1993No. 90-CV-301PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REILLY, Senior Judge:
Before us is an appeal from two separate post-judgment orders awarding attorney fees in the total amount of $585 to appel-lees which became final after such judgment was affirmed by this court in Connors, Fiscina, Swartz & Zimmerly v. Rees, et al., 599 A.2d 47 (D.C.1991). Our examination of the record reveals no error in the first order granting $250 in attorney fees to the movants, but provides no support for the second order awarding $335. We reverse the latter, affirm the first fee award, and remand to. the trial court for entry of an amended order.
I
The underlying…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- D.D. v. M.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Braxton v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Montgomery v. Jimmy's Tire & Auto Center, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Green v. Louis Fireison & AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Keene Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993