Legal Opinion
State v. Zoppi
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 15, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
196 N.J. Super. 596 (1984)
483 A.2d 844
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BRADLEY T. ZOPPI, DEFENDANT.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DAVID MORGAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Monmouth County.
Decided August 15, 1984.
Michele D. O'Shea for the State (John A. Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney).
Robert J. Holden for defendant Zoppi.
Stephen Moore for defendant Morgan (Francis X. Moore, attorney).
McGANN, J.S.C.
These motions for leave to appeal were consolidated because they involve the same substantive issue. In the Zoppi case the State…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Frank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Muniz v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HammSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. SternNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- People v. CruzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1985
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DONTE SPAIN (A-5-19, GLOUCESTER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020