Legal Opinion

Hallman v. Campbell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1882No. Case No. 4593PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before the Hon. A. S. Walker.

1Opinion of the Court

Bonner, Associate Justice.

This is an agreed case under the statute. E. Hallman, appellant, as district clerk, in the case of R. F. Campbell v. George Newton, taxed in the bill of cost the sum of seventy-five cents for copy of citation to be served on. the defendant ; which item of cost was, on motion to re-tax, stricken out, and from that judgment this appeal is taken. The only question in the case is this: Are district clerks, under the Bevised Statutes, entitled to a fee of seventy-five cents for copy of the citation required to be served on the defendant?

' The statute in effect provides'…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moore v. Sheppard, Comp.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. McCalla v. City of RockdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. McLennan County v. BoggessTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Eastland County v. HazelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Curtin v. Harris CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API