Cottonport Bank v. Lee

The issues in this case are identical as those in the case of Cottonport Bank v. Dunn et al., La.App., 19 So.2d 654, save and except the allegation is made that on August 2, 1942, William Lee, after having defaulted on the monthly installments as called for by the notes, the basis of this suit, entered into an agreement whereby he acknowledged his indebtedness to the plaintiff to the amount of $222.48, with interest and attorney's fees. In this agreement, it is stated: "This indebtedness represents the consideration given for one Butane Gas System and equipment sold and delivered April 12,…