Legal Opinion

Pinckney v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 24, 2006No. 26141PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari to review the grant of post-conviction relief (PCR) and now reverse.

*503FACTS

Respondent was convicted of first degree burglary after he broke into a home at night and barricaded himself in the bathroom. When police officers arrived, respondent threatened to kill himself and the officers by spilling lamp oil and lighting it. On appeal, respondent’s conviction was affirmed.1 He then commenced this action for PCR.

The PCR judge granted relief on the ground trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request an additional charge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. PinckneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. AustinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Cartrette v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Cesar Bernel-AvejaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Cesar Bernel-AvejaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API